CV Google Scholar MSU
Demos · Demo 8 · Type 2: no right answer exists

Where would you apply it?

A question with no right answer, the kind researchers actually bring to these tools. Asked once, then a hundred times. Guide: Two kinds of questions →

What we asked

I want to build on prospect theory. What’s an interesting place to apply it?

Asked once

Run 1
“Here are a few interesting areas where you could apply or extend prospect theory:”
  1. Behavioral finance: the disposition effect, the equity premium puzzle
  2. Healthcare: risky treatments vs. certain outcomes
  3. Public policy: health advisories, climate, disaster preparedness
  4. Consumer behavior: how people perceive discounts and promotions

One draw. gpt-4o via the API, temperature 1.0.

Asked a hundred times

Then we asked a hundred times, adding “Name one.” The model gave 49 different answers, from “Behavioral finance in cryptocurrency markets” to “User experience design.” Grouped by idea, they come down to nine.

share of 100 runspapers
behavioral finance39%2,658
health21%367
climate20%637
cryptocurrency10%142
organizations2%641
insurance1%381
negotiation1%168
consumer1%641
other5%n/a
gpt-4o via the API, 100 runs · paper counts from OpenAlex · September 2026

What to notice

  1. You asked for interesting. It gave you the convention. The most common answer was behavioral finance, the idea with the most existing work behind it. What’s interesting is what denies an assumption the audience holds (Davis, 1971), and the most likely answer can’t do that by construction.
  2. 49 different wordings, nine ideas. The variety on the surface hides how few places the answers actually go.
  3. One answer hides this range. Because a single run shows you one draw, your judgment needs many options to work with.
  4. Nothing here is wrong, so no check will catch it. Whether the answer is any good depends on what you wanted, which is why it pays to decide that before you ask.

Limits

One question, one model. Paper counts are from OpenAlex and are rough indicators of how much work exists on each idea. Davis, M. S. (1971). That’s interesting! Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1(4), 309–344. doi.org/10.1177/004839317100100211